Estudio DISCREPA: tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson avanzada y utilización de terapias de segunda línea en Cataluña / DISCREPA study: treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease and use of second-line treatments in Catalonia

INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento de la enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) es complejo y la instauración de terapias de segunda línea en la EP avanzada sigue siendo controvertida. OBJETIVO: Analizar la asistencia de pacientes con EP en Cataluña, con especial atención a la utilización de las terapias de segunda línea en la EP avanzada. Sujetos y métodos: Encuesta en línea autoadministrada a través de la Societat Catalana de Neurología a neurólogos de Cataluña que atendían a pacientes con EP. RESULTADOS: Participaron 72 neurólogos que visitaban una media mensual de 38 pacientes con EP (el 37,3% con complicaciones motoras). El 86% preguntaba rutinariamente por complicaciones motoras. Los principales motivos para indicar terapias de segunda línea fueron la discapacidad en off (83,1%), el impacto de las discinesias (76,9%), el impacto del tiempo en off (75,4%) y el tiempo en off (73,8%). El 70% de los neurólogos declaró limitaciones para instaurar terapias de segunda línea: escasez de recursos en su hospital, falta de tiempo para visitar al paciente o para realizar tareas administrativas y falta de soporte de enfermería (33,3%). No se utilizan terapias de segunda línea en el 72% de los pacientes que podrían ser potencialmente candidatos, sobre todo por rechazo del paciente (37,9%). CONCLUSIONES: La mayoría de los neurólogos en Cataluña que visitan pacientes con EP pregunta rutinariamente por complicaciones motoras sin utilizar herramientas específicas. Aunque los neurólogos conocen bien las indicaciones de instauración de terapias de segunda línea, la negativa del paciente, la falta de tiempo y la falta de protocolos asistenciales definidos para derivar a pacientes pueden contribuir a una menor utilización de terapias de segunda línea en la EP avanzada

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex, and the establishment of second-line therapies in advanced PD remains controversial. AIM: To analyze the assistance of patients with PD in Catalonia, with special attention to the use of second-line therapies in advanced PD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Online self-administered survey to neurologists in Catalonia who treated patients with PD, through the Catalan Society of Neurology. RESULTS: 72 neurologists who visited a monthly average of 38 PD patients (37.3% motor complications) participated. 86% routinely asked about motor. The main reasons for indicating second-line therapies were disability in off (83.1%), impact of dyskinesias (76.9%), impact of time in off (75.4%) and time in off (73.8%). 70% of neurologists declared limitations to establish second-line therapies: lack of resources in their hospital, lack of time to visit the patient or to perform administrative tasks and lack nursing support. Second-line therapies is not used in 72% of patients who could potentially be candidates, especially due to patient rejection (37.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of neurologists in Catalonia who visit patients with PD routinely ask about motor complications without using specific tools. Although neurologists are well aware of the indications for the establishment of second-line therapies, the refusal of the patient, the lack of time and the lack of defined care protocols to refer patients, they can contribute to a lower use of second-line therapies in advanced PD

Development and conceptual validation of a questionnaire to help contraceptive choice: CHLOE (Contraception: HeLping for wOmen's choicE).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to develop a questionnaire to facilitate choice of the most appropriate contraceptive method for individual women. METHODS: A literature review was conducted to identify key aspects influencing contraceptive choice and inform development of a questionnaire for online completion. Questionnaire development was overseen by a steering committee consisting of eight gynaecologists from across Europe. The initial draft underwent conceptual validation through cognitive debriefing interviews with six native English-speaking women. A qualitative content analysis was conducted to accurately identify potential issues and areas for questionnaire improvement. A revised version of the questionnaire then underwent face-to-face and online evaluation by 115 international gynaecologists/obstetricians with expertise in contraception, prior to development of a final version. RESULTS: The final conceptually validated Contraception: HeLping for wOmen's choicE (CHLOE) questionnaire takes ≤10 min to complete and includes three sections to elicit general information about the individual, the health conditions that might influence contraceptive choice, and the woman's needs and preferences that might influence contraceptive choice. The questionnaire captures the core aspects of personalisation, efficacy and safety, identified as key attributes influencing contraceptive choice, and consists of 24 closed-ended questions for online completion prior to a health care provider (HCP) consultation. The HCP receives a summary of the responses. CONCLUSION: The CHLOE questionnaire has been developed to help women choose the contraception that best suits their needs and situation while optimising the HCP's time.